Dantas also went on the offensive against Citi. In a federal suit filed in February in New York, he alleged that the bank conspired with Brazilian officials to wrest his interest in the telecom company a decade ago.
Las imágenes de las multitudinarias protestas en la isla tras el escándalo del chat del gobernador Ricardo Roselló Las imágenes de las multitudinarias protestas en la isla tras el escándalo del chat del gobernador Ricardo Roselló
Mr Dantas is often portrayed as a kind of dark genius of Brazilian finance: Darth Vader with spreadsheets. He has, he notes in a tone of incredulity that perhaps contains a little pride, appeared on the cover of one of the country's business magazines more often than George Bush.
El autor intelectual de los atentados del 11-S "está dispuesto" a testificar contra Arabia Saudita si EE.UU. le libra do la pena por muerte
He was imprisoned, humiliated, and hit by the security guards on Dantas’ ranch.†Later, Silva stated that the guards had shown him a list of local MST leaders, ordering him to identify where they were. “We are going to kill all of the leaders of the encampment,†said one of the guards.
As to the first, he alleges that he relied to his detriment by moving to Brazil and managing the portfolio, but that promise is extinguished as a matter of law by the Shareholders' Agreement containing a merger/integration clause and the unenforceable bullet point regarding carried interest. The agreement covers the same subject matter as the alleged promise (terms of employment), and by its express terms extinguishes all prior representations (see supra at 12-13). In addition, courts are reluctant to find that sophisticated business people have detrimentally relied on an agreement that was not documented (401 Hotel v MTI/Image Group, 251 AD2d 125, 126 [1st Dept 1998]).
In light of this fact, there is no reason to infer, as the majority does, that the agreements were negotiated in New York as opposed to Brazil. This is not a matter of what the majority describes as an inartfully drafted pleading. Rather, the complaint is simply devoid of jurisdictional facts that could have been alleged had they existed. The lack of discovery cited by the majority is of pelo moment. Plaintiff could have requested jurisdictional discovery pursuant to CPLR 3211(d), but did not do so. I therefore assume that it was unnecessary.
It is the law in this State that courts should avoid imposing a fiduciary or other heightened duty upon the parties when they expressly disclaim it. Both Justice Wilson of the Court of Appeals in his dissent in a prior appeal in this action (see Wilson, 29 NY3d at 1065), and the Second Circuit, in affirming the Southern District's dismissal of identical claims against Citibank, reached the same conclusion (Wilson v Dantas, 2013 WL 92999 [SDNY 2013], affirmed 746 F3d 530 [2d Cir 2014] ["A fiduciary relationship between OEP's shareholders and Citibank cannot arise by virtue of the organizational structure outlined in OEP's Shareholder Agreement"]). Moreover, any fiduciary duty undertaken in this context would have run only to OEP/general partner. To the extent Wilson's claim is that assets owed to him as a shareholder and fiduciary of OEP/general partner were wrongfully diverted to defendants and other corporate fiduciaries, the enforcement of such duties and recovery of such assets, if any, belongs to OEP/general partner and not to Wilson, personally click here (see Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953-54 [1985]). The Court rejects the contention that an issue of fact is raised by virtue of the joint venture allegations that defendants assert in the 2005 and 2017 Opportunity SDNY actions (Exhibits 2-3, annexed to the Reed Aff. [mot seq 10]). Dantas and the other defendants to those actions have consistently denied that Wilson was a member of the alleged joint venture, and their pleadings, which are undoubtedly judicial admissions, do not demonstrate otherwise.
Husbands/Wife and Childrens: All information about his private life is hidden orstays unknown, so it’s difficult to say if he has a wife or children.
"Mejor tener unas pocas ratas que ser una": la dura respuesta del diario The Baltimore Sun click here al ataque por Trump a la ciudad
After establishing that her love life has dropped to 25 times a year, Vani decides to spice up her relationship with menage-a-trois and the comedy continues.
The justification for binding a party to read more its express limitation implicates questions of notice and fairness. "To permit [the party to appeal other questions not raised] necessarily disadvantages the opposing parties, who might have joined issue or even cross-moved for leave to appeal as to additional issues had adequate notice been given" (id. at 380).
Indeed, Licci illustrated just how permissive the standard is, when it found personal jurisdiction over a defendant bank that get more info allegedly transferred money from a New York correspondent account to a foundation that used the money to finance rocket attacks in a foreign country (id. at 340-341). Although the plaintiffs' cause of action for breach of statutory duties arose indirectly from the defendant bank's New York contacts —- because "the specific harms suffered by plaintiffs flowed not from [the bank's] alleged support of a terrorist organization, but rather from rockets" — the Court found that the bank's deliberate and frequent use of a New York account "to effect its support of [the foundation] and shared terrorist goals" satisfied CPLR 302(a)(1) because "at least one element [of plaintiff's claim arose] from the New York contacts" (see id.
The violence took place at the EspÃrito Santo cattle ranch in here the municipality of Xinguara, in the state of Pará. About 120 families organized in the MST have been occupying part of the thousand-acre ranch since February.